08 7111 0375

First consultation free

GUILTY PLEA DOESN’T MEAN IT’S IN THE BAG – WHAT IS A DISPUTED FACTS HEARING

GUILTY PLEA DOESN’T MEAN IT’S IN THE BAG – WHAT IS A DISPUTED FACTS HEARING

Recently, a woman who was charged with stealing an 88 year old man’s briefcase that contained over $30,000 admitted to theft of the case, but said that there was only $1,500 inside.  What does the Court do when a person pleads guilty to a charge but says that the facts are very different from what the police claim?  Obviously it can make a big difference to the penalty depending on which facts are applied.

Open briefcase full of money vector illustration isolated on white. Suitcase staffed by dollar banknotes, leather case with cash

It isn’t unusual for a situation like this to arise.  A person might want to plead guilty to a charge of assault knowing that they only pushed the victim over, but the allegation could be that they then repeatedly kicked the victim which they deny.  Clearly the question of whether that actually happened would be very relevant in working out the most appropriate penalty.

In these cases, the Court can conduct a ‘disputed facts hearing’ to find out which set of facts is correct.  On this occasion, the Court had to determine the question of how much cash was in the briefcase.

The elderly man lived alone and almost two years earlier he withdrew his savings of just over $40,000 from his bank.  It was said that he had told his son-in-law some months before the theft that he had $70,000 in the briefcase although he had later spent $12,000 on a car.  The briefcase was hidden in his lounge room.  The woman who stole the bag went to his house with her friend who knew the man and after they left the man noticed that the briefcase had been taken.  The police were called and the woman was eventually interviewed by police and admitted stealing the bag, but claimed that she only took $1,500 out of it.

A disputed facts hearing was held to try to work out which set of facts was correct.

An important aspect to this process is what is called the ‘standard of proof’.  If the Court is going to take into account anything that is against the interests of the person charged then that has to be proved ‘beyond reasonable doubt’.  On the other hand, any fact that is in favour of the accused person only needs to be proved ‘on the balance of probabilities’.

What complicated things was that the only person who could really say how much money was in the suitcase – the man who put it there – did not want to give evidence.  That might not be a surprise given that he was now 90 years old.   But it meant that the prosecution had to try to prove how much money was in the suitcase some other way.

While there were bank records that the man had taken out the $40,000 from his bank, he was the only person who could say what he did with it.  On one earlier occasion his son-in-law had seen the man open the briefcase and noted that there were envelopes inside which contained a lot of cash.  They were about two inches thick and contained $50 and $100 notes, but this was about four or five months before the theft.

It didn’t help the woman’s case that when she was first spoken to by the police she denied taking the briefcase altogether.  In a second interview she admitted stealing the bag saying that her life was in danger and she had been threatened by others who wanted her house and money and so she grabbed the suitcase.  She said that when she got home she busted open the suitcase.  There were other people in the room and she went to the toilet.  She had only grabbed one envelope containing money and said that it was possible there was more money in the bag which the others might have taken.

Another problem for the woman was that while she claimed she only took $1,500 out of the case, there was evidence that she had telephoned someone shortly after the theft and offered to buy a car for $2,500.

At the end of the day the Judge didn’t accept the woman’s account that she only stole $1,500 and said that it was probable that there was significantly more money in the briefcase.  But he also couldn’t conclude that there was as much as the prosecution claimed, whether that was $30,000 or more.  The woman had to be sentenced on the basis that she stole at least $1,500 although as the Judge noted, it remains a very serious crime to steal even that sum from an 88 year old victim.

As this case shows, just because a person admits a charge and wants to plead guilty doesn’t mean that there won’t be a need for a Court hearing where evidence will be called.  It is important to find out the actual basis for a criminal charge as soon as possible.  An experienced criminal lawyer at Websters Lawyers can assist you to get that information and make an informed decision about how to proceed with the case.  To speak with an expert criminal lawyer call us on 8231 1363 or submit an enquiry online.

R v Stevens [2018] SADC 107

FREE FIRST INTERVIEW

NO WIN NO FEE

LOCAL LAWYERS FOR LOCAL NEEDS

GET THE RIGHT LAWYER FIRST

Testimonials

Having such a short time frame I was very impressed with the outcome made by [my solicitor]. Excellent and timely manner

Sebastian

Kurralta Park

Very professional mannerism and overall great outcome was delivered by Websters Lawyers.

Nicholas

West Ryde NSW

Helpful, explained fully, patient, excellent service.

Kerry

Ridgehaven

Patient and helpful in explaining the process.

Brian

Ridgehaven

Call Websters Lawyers for a most professional and friendly service. All understanding with [my solicitors] and the reception staff. Thank you so much.

Christine

Magill

Making my will was effortless on my part, with everything explained clearly. Well done to all.

Christina

Highbury

Great service, professional, explains things clearly, definitely recommend Websters Lawyers.

Garth

Upper Hermitage

Patient, professional, good communication about procedures and probable outcomes.

Jeffrey

Brompton

Thank you for all your work over the course of the case. You [both] were always very approachable and I appreciated your understanding and professionalism in all areas.

Alexis

Christie Downs

All in all my experience was great. Thank you for your time and expertise.

Christina

Seacombe Gardens

My matter was dealt with efficiently and was explained in an understandable language. A pleasant experience.

Mary

Ridgehaven

Practical and very helpful. Reasons and explanations given where needed

John

Ridgehaven

I stumbled across Websters in the Yellow Pages and I rang, explained my situation and immediately they took my case on. Greatly appreciate their services.

Diane 

Ridgehaven

The service from Websters Lawyers was outstanding. [My solicitor] was caring, had patience and was very professional. Wonderful personality.

Julie

Yorketown

[My solicitor] made everything so simple to understand. [The receptionist] was wicked too, would recommend them anytime. Level of entire service was outstanding.

Craig

Golden Grove

 

I had dealings with Websters over 20 years ago. They were my first choice when I recently needed legal advice. Both legal and office staff were professional, courteous and accessible at all times. Everything was explained up front in a clear and concise manner. I would not hesitate to recommend their services.

Rod

Dernancourt

It has truly been a pleasure communicating with you throughout the process. I really appreciate your patient and speedy replies to my questions and requests. You were always able to provide an easily understood response and this helped me deal with the process. Your friendly and positive manner encouraged me to seek your advice.

Kathleen

Battery Hill QLD

[My lawyer's] service was prompt and efficient with all questions explained clearly with all our requests carried out within the laws. Overall service was very satisfactory.

John

Wynn Vale

[My lawyer] was excellent. 

Gordon

Glengowrie

Excellent service. Professional. Clear advice and instructions. Prompt actions. Overall 10/10!

Phillip

Ingle Farm

Overall, I was happy with my outcome and my lawyer, would definitely recommend [my lawyer].

Janet

Adelaide

[My solicitor] was excellent at helping us through preparing our wills which were particularly challenging as they involved assets in multiple countries. She was professional and knowledgeable and spent time tailoring the wills to our needs.

Jonathan

Greenwith

[My solicitor] was very helpful, respectful and polite. She made sure I understood the process and documentation of our wills.

Rachel

Greenwith

Professional. Smooth Transaction. 

Luke

Largs North

I found the whole experience from Receptionist to Solicitor excellent. They completely put us at our ease.

Ethel

Smithfield

This was a new experience for us and didn’t have a clue what to do. [Our solicitor] on our first visit put us at ease, explained what will happen, pointed out there was a strong case. [Our solicitor] was genuine in her approach, kept us well informed, explained actions several times with patience and understanding. Overall very happy with the service we received.

Stephen

Elizabeth Vale

[My lawyer] was very reassuring in her approach to my case. I felt that every possibility in terms of evidence to provide and possible outcomes were explained to me, The result of the case was the best possible outcome I could have expected.

David, Belair

 

With no previous dealing with the criminal justice system, [our solicitor] gave us excellent advice and guided us through a nightmare to achieve a just and correct outcome. [Our lawyer] was both forthright and compassionate in her handling of our case.

Malcolm, Belair

[My lawyer] explained all the legal terms in language I could understand – she was very easy to talk to.

Cameron, Munno Para

I felt confident knowing my matter was in good hands. Very professional!

Shravan, Christie Downs

Initial phone call was fantastic and the role of an executor was fully explained.

Penny, Henley Beach

The service I received was efficient and promptly finalised. The solicitor clearly explained the details and I was happy with how easy it was.

Dale, Fairview Park

[My lawyer] was exactly the lawyer I needed in a serious matter. The outcome was as predicted which was a fantastic result. I received prompt professional and personal service at all times. Capable and supportive in a very stressful period.

Jason, Munno Para West

I had any of my concerns answered to my satisfaction and understanding.

Valda, Ingle Farm

[My lawyer] is an excellent professional lawyer who assisted in achieving a great positive outcome/result. I sincerely thank you and your great staff for your assistance and guidance throughout my claim. Would highly recommend [my lawyer], staff and Websters Lawyers. Kept fully informed and guided, professionally throughout the matter.

Rena, Northgate

Our work was dealt with very efficiently and speedily. Our lawyer was very professional, at the same time as being approachable. Communication was great.

Christina, Highbury

My experience with Websters Lawyers was far beyond what I expected. From the moment I spoke to [my lawyer] she made me feel very comfortable and eased my stress. In my case I had a court appearance the day before we were scheduled to fly to Spain, Considering my first appointment with her was only 2 weeks before the court hearing, she was able to obtain the police statement and thoroughly work on my case within that limited time frame. She was very knowledgeable, understanding and confident which greatly relieved so much pressure from me and my family. At court, she explained everything thoroughly and advised me of all the possible outcomes. Price, service and result, very highly recommended. Thank you Websters Lawyers.

Rafael, Davoren Park

I have high expectations and they were met. Websters service was swift, courteous, professional and met the agreed budget. I will recommend Websters to my family, friends and colleagues. Thank you.

Peter, Forestville

I would recommend Websters Lawyers, especially for [my lawyer's] dedication and exemplary attitude and advice. She is the epitome of a good lawyer. The service was impeccable.

Pamela, West Lakes

[My lawyer] was very professional and I was made comfortable to understand.

Gregory, Penfield

I was very pleased with the end result and how well [my lawyer] conducted herself.

Sonya, Glanville

Very professional.

Jesse, Morphett Vale

[My lawyer] has been very prompt , reliable and provided a high level of communication.

Peter, Parkside

My experience at Websters was very positive. The stress was taken from me and I could not be happier with the outcome. [My lawyer] at Websters was professional, personable, available and caring. Thank you for making the experience stress free.

Magda, Holden Hill

Found my lawyer upfront and reliable – I would highly recommend Websters Lawyers.

Lee, Evanston Park

 

Top bunch of solicitors and admin staff. Very friendly and to the point service.

Bradley, Hallett Cove

Websters Lawyers were very professional in their service, I would be happy to recommend them.

Carole, Tea Tree Gully

We would not hesitate in recommending Websters for any legal matter. They are professional and courteous at all times and call back when they say they will.

David and Dianne, Lockleys

 

I fully recommend Websters Lawyers. This was the 3rd time myself & my family have used Websters Lawyers. In these stressful times we have found them to answer and guide us through the process needed to accomplish the legal requirements in a timely and courteous manner.

Dianne, Lynton

Solid, to the point, no hustle. Highly recommend.

George, Windsor Gardens

Contact us

Adelaide Office :
T: ( 08 ) 8231 1363
F: ( 08 ) 8231 5529

Ridgehaven Office :
T: ( 08 ) 8395 8000
F: ( 08 ) 8395 8222

Smithfield Office :
T: ( 08 ) 8487 0150
F: ( 08 ) 8395 8222

© Copyright WebstersLawyers.com 2017 All Rights Reserved
Website By A to Z Marketing

Leave a Comment