08 7111 0375

First consultation free

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT THREATENS TO OVERSHADOW SOLAR PANELS

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT THREATENS TO OVERSHADOW SOLAR PANELS

-By Jake Woolford –

Does a property owner have the right to access sunlight? Should it be a protected right? These were the issues when a proposed development threatened to overshadow another property’s solar panels. The neighbour raised objections with the local council and the council refused to consent to the development. The developer took legal action but was unsuccessful. The case also deals with issues about the size of proposed developments.

Solar-Panels-iStock-531308920-2

Background – Proposed development

A developer wanted to build an apartment building and so applied to the Adelaide City Council for development approval. The land was in a residential part of the city centre and some single storey homes would have to be demolished to make way for the development.

The development was to be 4 storeys high, consisting of 6 apartments and a carpark. The neighbour objected because it would completely overshadow her solar hot water service and for many hours of the day, would overshadow her other solar panels and her yard. The development would also overshadow the communal vegetable garden that was in the area, which would affect the success of the garden and its ability to provide fresh produce for the local residents.

The Council initially refused the application because it overshadowed the neighbouring property and it was the wrong type of development for the area.

The developer appealed this decision, arguing that the proposed development was within the maximum height that the area’s development plan allowed.

The Council argued that the proposed development didn’t fit in with the desired character of the development plan and it also didn’t fit in with the other homes that were already there. It used experts to show the effects of the proposed development overshadowing the neighbouring properties. The evidence was that there would be overshadowing on:

  • The neighbour’s solar hot water service.
  • The neighbour’s rooftop solar panels.
  • The windows of neighbouring properties.
  • The communal garden.

The Court also heard that On June 22 (winter solstice):

  • The solar hot water service would be in full shadow between 9am and 3pm.
  • Ninety percent of the solar panels would be shaded between 9am and 1.15pm and then one hundred percent shaded after that time. However, if the proposed development were only two storeys high, there would be no overshadowing.
  • There would be overshadowing on the communal garden between 9am and 3pm regardless of whether the building was two or four storeys high. Development laws required that the garden have at least two hours of direct sunlight.

Decision

The court found that the proposed development didn’t fit the development plan. There were a number of reasons for this, including the bulk of the property and the issue of overshadowing.

It said that because the proposed development was four storeys high, the issue of overshadowing was potentially much worse than if it were, say, two storeys high. Despite this, the Court was more concerned with the amount of sunlight in the open and communal spaces and to property windows. It was also a problem that the solar panels and hot water service were overshadowed.

What does it mean?

Whether a property owner has a right to solar power will be a question of increasing importance, especially as gas and electricity prices continue to rise and reliable power supply becomes uncertain. However, the court didn’t decide this case on whether this right existed but rather looked at the requirements of the development plan.

The court found that the proposed development didn’t comply with the plan and so it was inappropriate. It was excessively bulky and far too big. This meant that it failed to minimise the effects of overshadowing.

Because of the strict requirements concerning overshadowing issues, it is possible to infer a right to solar power because of there is a right not to be subjected to overshadowing by a neighbouring building.

For the time being, however, the court hasn’t made any specific decision about whether there is a right to solar power.

If you are concerned about how a proposed development will affect you, contact us today for a free first interview. Because the sooner you act, often the better off you’ll be.

Ned Ritan Design v The Court of the City of Adelaide [2016] SAERDC 32

FREE FIRST INTERVIEW

NO WIN NO FEE

LOCAL LAWYERS FOR LOCAL NEEDS

GET THE RIGHT LAWYER FIRST

Testimonials

Having such a short time frame I was very impressed with the outcome made by [my solicitor]. Excellent and timely manner

Sebastian

Kurralta Park

Very professional mannerism and overall great outcome was delivered by Websters Lawyers.

Nicholas

West Ryde NSW

Helpful, explained fully, patient, excellent service.

Kerry

Ridgehaven

Patient and helpful in explaining the process.

Brian

Ridgehaven

Call Websters Lawyers for a most professional and friendly service. All understanding with [my solicitors] and the reception staff. Thank you so much.

Christine

Magill

Making my will was effortless on my part, with everything explained clearly. Well done to all.

Christina

Highbury

Great service, professional, explains things clearly, definitely recommend Websters Lawyers.

Garth

Upper Hermitage

Patient, professional, good communication about procedures and probable outcomes.

Jeffrey

Brompton

Thank you for all your work over the course of the case. You [both] were always very approachable and I appreciated your understanding and professionalism in all areas.

Alexis

Christie Downs

All in all my experience was great. Thank you for your time and expertise.

Christina

Seacombe Gardens

My matter was dealt with efficiently and was explained in an understandable language. A pleasant experience.

Mary

Ridgehaven

Practical and very helpful. Reasons and explanations given where needed

John

Ridgehaven

I stumbled across Websters in the Yellow Pages and I rang, explained my situation and immediately they took my case on. Greatly appreciate their services.

Diane 

Ridgehaven

The service from Websters Lawyers was outstanding. [My solicitor] was caring, had patience and was very professional. Wonderful personality.

Julie

Yorketown

[My solicitor] made everything so simple to understand. [The receptionist] was wicked too, would recommend them anytime. Level of entire service was outstanding.

Craig

Golden Grove

 

I had dealings with Websters over 20 years ago. They were my first choice when I recently needed legal advice. Both legal and office staff were professional, courteous and accessible at all times. Everything was explained up front in a clear and concise manner. I would not hesitate to recommend their services.

Rod

Dernancourt

It has truly been a pleasure communicating with you throughout the process. I really appreciate your patient and speedy replies to my questions and requests. You were always able to provide an easily understood response and this helped me deal with the process. Your friendly and positive manner encouraged me to seek your advice.

Kathleen

Battery Hill QLD

[My lawyer's] service was prompt and efficient with all questions explained clearly with all our requests carried out within the laws. Overall service was very satisfactory.

John

Wynn Vale

[My lawyer] was excellent. 

Gordon

Glengowrie

Excellent service. Professional. Clear advice and instructions. Prompt actions. Overall 10/10!

Phillip

Ingle Farm

Overall, I was happy with my outcome and my lawyer, would definitely recommend [my lawyer].

Janet

Adelaide

[My solicitor] was excellent at helping us through preparing our wills which were particularly challenging as they involved assets in multiple countries. She was professional and knowledgeable and spent time tailoring the wills to our needs.

Jonathan

Greenwith

[My solicitor] was very helpful, respectful and polite. She made sure I understood the process and documentation of our wills.

Rachel

Greenwith

Professional. Smooth Transaction. 

Luke

Largs North

I found the whole experience from Receptionist to Solicitor excellent. They completely put us at our ease.

Ethel

Smithfield

This was a new experience for us and didn’t have a clue what to do. [Our solicitor] on our first visit put us at ease, explained what will happen, pointed out there was a strong case. [Our solicitor] was genuine in her approach, kept us well informed, explained actions several times with patience and understanding. Overall very happy with the service we received.

Stephen

Elizabeth Vale

Contact us

Adelaide Office :
T: ( 08 ) 8231 1363
F: ( 08 ) 8231 5529

Ridgehaven Office :
T: ( 08 ) 8395 8000
F: ( 08 ) 8395 8222

Smithfield Office :
T: ( 08 ) 8487 0150
F: ( 08 ) 8395 8222

© Copyright WebstersLawyers.com 2017 All Rights Reserved
Website By A to Z Marketing